Traditional Costing vs Target Costing

Traditionally, manufacturers would make use of the cost-plus approach to estimate the product price. A starting point for them would be to conduct market research to determine its market segment’s preferences and hence its products’ characteristics that will meet the customer’s needs. This will be followed by the design of the product. Next manufacturer’s process is determined. Vendors will then be contacted to identify the total cost components which are required by the design and engineering departments. Finally, cost components are summed up, and a selling price is set based on the costs. If the management and the market department think an acceptable cost is reached, after which, production will begin.

In contrast, target costing derives an “allowable” product cost by first carrying out market research to predict what the market segment is willing to pay for the desired product with the specific characteristics. Subtracting the desired profit margin set by the management from the predicted selling price, maximum target cost is arrived at. This target cost is then compared to an expected product cost, and if it is higher than the expected product cost, the company has several options. First, to lower costs, the product design and/or the engineering process can be changed. This is carried out by all the member of the planning team (the suppliers, design, engineering, and production and marketing department) who will investigate the need and cost each component. The entire member will work together instead of going through various departments sequentially to reduce cost. When the target cost reached, standards can be set and product will then enter the manufacturing phase. Secondly, the management might consider accepting a less –than desired profit margin. This will depend on the numerical difference between expected cost and target cost. If the target cost is slightly higher than the expected cost, a slightly lower profit margin will be feasible.  However, if the difference too great and there is no way for the company to earn the profit margin that is desired, its third alternative would be to abandon that particular product. in short, Target costing can be viewed as a system of profit planning and cost management that cost management that is customer focused, price-led, a design centred and cross-functional.

In brief the use of target costing forces managers to change their way of thinking with regard to the relationship among cost, selling price, and profitability. The traditional mindset has been that a product is developed, the production cost is identified and measured, a selling price is set, and either profits  or losses will result, However, in target costing, a product is developed, a selling price and desired profit is determined, and the maximum allowable cost is derived. This makes cost dependent on selling prices

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related Posts

Dependent and Independent Investments
In evaluating the investment proposals presented to management, it is important to be aware of the possible interrelationships between pairs of ...
Audit, Assurance and Compliance - A case study of BHP Billiton
Executive SummaryThe report has provided an insight into the annual report of BHP Billiton for the assessing, analysing and evaluating the r...
Meaning of Ad Valorem
“Ad valorem” is derived from a ‘latin’ word which means ‘according to value’. Ad valorem is a tax or a duty levied by the state, local or municip...
powered by RelatedPosts